Growth & Scaling
The plumbing, not the tap: What Rolex gets about marketing
Most brands treat marketing like a tap they control. Rolex treats it like plumbing. One of those approaches builds a waitlist. The other manages one.
Rolex launched new Instagram ads this week. Watches and Wonders is happening in Geneva, new references dropped on April 13, and the ads went live the same day. Not to drive traffic to a purchase page. Not to capture leads. Just to tell a story.
That is either a waste of money or the entire point, depending on how you think about marketing.
In 2023, I became a Canadian citizen. I wanted to mark the moment with something that would last. So I did what you do: I walked into an authorized dealer. If you have ever done that with a specific watch in mind, you already know the punchline. The waitlist has a waitlist. The sales associate was kind about it. The conversation lasted maybe eight minutes. I left without a watch and, somehow, more interested in the brand than when I walked in.
That experience is not a bug. It is what a hundred years of consistent marketing actually produces.
The tap versus the plumbing
Most brands treat advertising like a tap. When pipeline slows, they open it. When it fills, they shut it. The logic feels sound: spend money when you need customers, save it when you don't. But that logic treats marketing as a cost to be managed rather than infrastructure being built. And infrastructure you only build when you need it is not infrastructure. It is a repair bill.
Rolex runs ads for watches people cannot buy. Not because the company miscalculated demand, but because demand is not the point. The point is the story being laid down, year after year, in the minds of people who may not be buyers for another decade. By the time someone has saved enough, or achieved enough, or needs to mark a moment that matters, the brand has already been living in their head for years. The waitlist is just the physical evidence of that.
What consistency actually costs
The uncomfortable part of this model is that it requires spending money when there is no immediate return to point to. No conversion rate to report. No pipeline attribution to show the CFO. Just a slow, compounding accumulation of presence that only becomes legible at scale, over time.
Most businesses do not have Rolex's margin structure or its century of runway. That is a fair objection. But the underlying principle holds regardless of budget size: marketing that runs only when you need customers is always starting from zero. Marketing that runs consistently is building something. The gap between those two approaches widens every year you stay in the market.
The return on not stopping
I like one of the new releases. My odds of getting it are not good. I know this. I watched the ad anyway. What landed was not the watch. It was the Oyster Perpetual story underneath it: a hundred years of incremental refinement, each version a little closer to right, none of them declared finished.
That is the return on a hundred years of not turning the tap off. Not a sale. A story that holds its shape long enough to matter when the moment arrives.
I am still waiting. But the marketing already worked.